About PeptidePick
An independent review platform built to help researchers find trustworthy peptide suppliers – without the noise, bias, or vendor influence.
Our Mission
The research peptide market has a trust problem. Dozens of vendors make bold claims about purity and quality, but few back them up with verifiable evidence. Meanwhile, most “review” sites are quietly run by – or financially tied to – the very companies they claim to evaluate.
We started PeptidePick to fix that.
Our goal is straightforward: provide honest, data-backed vendor reviews and well-researched peptide information so that buyers can make informed decisions. We don’t accept free products from vendors, we don’t run sponsored placements, and we don’t let affiliate relationships influence our ratings. If a vendor earns a high score here, it’s because the data supports it.
How We Review Vendors
Every vendor review on PeptidePick follows the same structured evaluation process. We score companies across five categories:
1. Purity and Testing (30%)
Do they provide third-party COAs? Are HPLC purity results consistently above 98%? Is mass spectrometry data available? We verify these claims directly.
2. Transparency (25%)
Is COA data accessible before purchase? Does the company share information about their sourcing and manufacturing? Do they have a verifiable business address?
3. Pricing and Value (20%)
We compare per-milligram pricing across vendors for identical peptides. Cheapest doesn’t mean best – we weigh price against verified purity.
4. Shipping and Fulfillment (15%)
Average delivery times, packaging quality (cold chain for sensitive peptides), tracking availability, and international shipping options.
5. Customer Experience (10%)
Website usability, customer support responsiveness, return/refund policies, and aggregated customer feedback from verified sources.
Our Team
PeptidePick is run by a small editorial and research team with backgrounds in biochemistry, health journalism, and consumer product testing.
Our research team handles vendor evaluations – reviewing COAs, comparing lab results, placing test orders, and documenting the full buyer experience. Our editorial team writes the guides and articles, grounding everything in published research and citing sources wherever possible.
We don’t put individual names and faces on the site. This is a deliberate choice. Peptide review sites that build around a single personality often become vehicles for that person’s affiliate deals. We’d rather let the data and methodology speak for themselves.
Editorial Standards
- No sponsored content. Every article and review is written by our team. We don’t publish vendor-supplied copy.
- No free product influence. We don’t accept free samples from vendors we review. Test orders are paid for out of our own budget.
- Affiliate disclosure. We do earn commissions through affiliate links. This is how we fund the site. But affiliate relationships never determine our ratings or rankings. We’ve given low scores to vendors whose affiliate programs pay well, and high scores to vendors with no affiliate program at all.
- Corrections policy. If we get something wrong, we fix it and note the correction. Accuracy matters more than being first.
- Research citations. Our peptide guides reference published studies wherever possible. We link to sources so you can verify our claims yourself.
Affiliate Disclosure
PeptidePick participates in affiliate programs with some of the vendors we review. When you click a link to a vendor’s site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
This revenue is what allows us to operate – paying for test orders, lab verification research, web hosting, and our team’s time. However, we want to be clear: affiliate commissions do not influence our vendor ratings or editorial content.
Our review methodology is applied consistently to every vendor, regardless of whether they offer an affiliate program. You can read the full details of our scoring system above.